wormvenom:

oystersaintforme:

has anyone ever had the problem where you literally never want to do anything that you cannot reap benefits from immediately

like maybe I’m hungry but everything I have in the house at the moment would take 10+ minutes to prepare so I just……put off making the food for WAY longer than it would have taken to prepare the food when I first got hungry

Or i want to order some necessary thing online but the website says it will take a week to get here and i’m like “oh well fuck that” so I put off ordering it for like a week

Or if im like “I should clean my room because I like when it’s clean” but I know it’ll take me a couple hours so I don’t do it for like six months

It’s like there are only two times for me: right this instant and The Entire Rest Of The Future.

Lmao that’s like the major adhd thing!

kristsune:

“Death doesn’t stop David Bowie”

- me when telling my inlaws that David Bowie is bisexual (MIL said “was” and the hubs and i insisted “is”)

everythingfox:

nom

Juniper the Fox

humming-fly:

nurselofwyr:

foxghost:

Get yourself un-shadowbanned
That post seems to be going around a bit but not the reblog on how to fix it, so here’s another

  • Go to postlimit, put in your blog name, TAKE A SCREENSHOT
  • Go to tumblr support and file a support ticket. Category: Blog incorrectly marked explicit. Details: posts hidden from search results. Attach the screenshot. Do this even if you’ve already filed a support ticket N days ago without a screenshot. Make sure the relevant blog is chosen and you have the right contact email address.

They got back to me within an hour.

Seriously - follow this. I was shadow-banned, and they fixed it within seconds.

Not an exaggeration - I got the “we received your ticket” and “we’ve fixed it” e-mail in the same minute.

ok I filled this support form out TWICE without hearing back from staff for weeks, but literally the second i sent the form with the screenshot the problem was resolved - there is clearly some sort of bot checking for attachments so this is a genuinely good solution if you’ve been shadowbanned 

thotvengers:

roaringstream:

vandrop:

Cassini’s last image before entering Saturn’s atmosphere and burning up. Wow !

image

This post is a whole movie

keyhollow:

i-fear-neither-death-nor-pain:

alexaloraetheris:

lubricates:

Merry Christmas!!!

*ccto*

As a biologist I am literally incapable of not reblogging this.

Is… is that a normal blood cell, @keyhollow ?

Ye, looks like a segmented white blood cell

gallusrostromegalus:

scmilitarybrat replied to your chat

“Star Wars Galaxy Asks”

Ya’ll explain to me why Star Wars is still such a hit? I saw the original movie when it opened (I was 17, you do the math). It was amazing, but it was nothing compared to Star Trek (original/new). As a whole when it comes to Trek vs Wars films, I can’t find anyone under 50 who feels different. WHY?

You know, I have some thoughts on this. 

There’s a couple of things I’d like to establish before we dig into my theory of Fandom Consumption of SW vs ST 

1. SW and ST are actually different genres, with different narrative structures and different narrative goals 

SW is a Space Fantasy- it’s got all you classical fairy-tale-type narrative arcs and devices, but given the aestheics of Space and a few trappings of Sci-Fi.  There’s a lot of exploration of what can be DONE with narrative, but also it’s ultimately a series for children and young adults.
ST by comparison is a series of Space-Flavored Fables- the early seasons in particular are rather bluntly philosophically didactic, but it’s always been about ethics one way or another. It’s really meant for a young adult to older adult audience- there’s a reason the original Spirk Shippers were in their 40′s.

2. …and as such, appeal to different kinds of fans.

There’s been discussion on Tumblr before about Curative vs Transformative fandom (if someone wants to add the link I’d be thrilled the search function is fuckt) Curative fans tend to work more with an established canon and analyze what that means in terms of creator intent, how the history of that universe played out, and the philisophical implcations of canon.  Transformative fans tend to say “to hell with the author, here’s what the narrative meant to me and I’m going to pick it apart for shiny bits to make my own narrative out of it”

If I had to speak from expirience: both appeal to curative and transformative fans, but the balance is rather weighted thusly: right now, ST has a LOT more curative/older fans, and SW has a lot more Transformative/younger fans.  Both fandoms are roughly the same size (in the millions) but have very different kinds of fans.

…Unless you were wondering what attracts people to SW so, in which case, here are some of it’s appeals, all of which boil down to “Star Wars Is Stupid”

1.  SW is Stupid: SW as a franchise has been TERRIBLE at keeping a canon, even before the disney takeover and ‘death of the EU’, which makes it fertile ground for transofrmative works.

Yes, it’s an appeal, really.

Between the movies, shows, books, comics, tv shorts, and so on, SW has got roughly six sets of conflicting canons, made by literally hundreds of authors, artists and directors.  Even Canon Canon is riddled with gaps and conflicting information. It’s a nightmare for any curator-type fan.

This is TERRIFIC if you’re a Transformative Type Fan (someone who wirtes fic, makes fanart, espouses fan theories etc) , becuase at this point, it’s not A Narrative That Must Be Adhered To, and is now more like a Promising Rummage Sale To Be Rifled Through For Shiny Bits. by picking and choosing the bits you want, SW can be made to deliver anything you need from it.  tragedy, comedy, a study in fictional economics, anything you want! 

After a certain point of neglect, poor canon curation stops being an annoyance and starts being an inviting substrate.

2. Star Wars is Stupid: Everyone is a Huge Moron, and that is SO entertaining.

Not gonna lie. Everyone in star wars is an IDIOT.  Everyone.  Even your brilliant tactician or subtle machinator or splendid politician or Wise elder is, eventually, a thundering dumbass whether its hubris or unwise emotional commitment or a straight-up lack of critical thinking skills.

This makes everyone.  So much fun to write.  It’s like watching cats do dumb cat things, but it’s also a space opera.  it’s wonderful.   If you DON’T like watching people make easily avoidable mistakes it’s probably extremely frustrating, but if you like a black comedy of terrible life choices, the prequels and animated series are for you!

3. Star wars is Stupid: SW is simpler, narratively speaking, and makes a good beginner’s sandbox.

Part of the reason that ST never really “Stuck” for me was that for a LONG time, I had a ton of damn trouble recognizing narrative symbolism, was bad at understanding forigen perspectives, and otheriwse had a lot of trouble with literature.  It didn’t improve until I was 23 and parts of my prefrontal lobe grew in, apaprently, and I STILLsuck at it.  There’s a reason I write mostly nonfiction.

ST, (mostly after the Shatner era, and a whole fucking lot by DS9) is remarkably narratively complex and philosophical by nature while SW is fairly simplistic in it’s philosphy and the cast of any given movie/book/show is really about six people. Its a lot less complex.

Which, if you’re younger and still learning how to write, a late bloomer or just not interested in investing a lot of spoons in your media, is nice.  It’s a good sandbox for beginner creators to create in, so much so that a good many of them never leave it.

4.  SW is Stu- actually one of the few things SW did do very well, even in the very beginning: It’s got the better aliens.

Not the BEST, virtually every actually-sci-fi-that-has-aliens has better aliens, but SW and ST are not Sci-Fi, they’re space fantasy and space fables, remember?

That said, Chewbacca is a more alien Alien than anything I remember appearing in TOS.  Industrial Light And Magic really brought their game when it came to making visually interesting, perosnally appealing and outright WEIRD aliens and honestly that’s a huge selling point for the series.  Of all the people I know who have OC’s for the universe, only a fraction of them have human OCs, and most of those are clone troopers, which are human but a very unusual circumstance of Human.

Related to Point 1 with the lack of canon: there’s a sort of… world-UN-building that’s happend with the SW franchise- bits of random ecology or xenobiology or history are thrown out by authors with almost no regard to how that fits in with the rest of established canon, so you end up with WILD shit like “Jabba The Hutt is a hermaphrodite that’s incapable of moving on his own anymore and could could regenerate from a major injury Deadpool style, but not hypoxia from strangling” which.  There’s a lot to unpack there and I’m going to have so much fun doing that. 

ST did eventually get there with the aliens, to the point where they were more interesting than the humans by DS9, but even then they never got to the level of 
“How the actual fuck does Jabba function as an organism?”

TL;DR: SW and ST are very different types of story with very differnt types of fan, and the type of fan that likes SW also tends to be younger and transformative in nature.  If you were wondering, they like SW because it’s Stupid and has weird aliens.

cannibalcoalition:

Cute story from work.

So this couple walks in- a broad-shouldered man with an accent (Italian, I think) and a man that I can best describe as looking like Cecil Palmer. 

“Okay- weird question. So you guys did our wedding- amazing by the way. And it’s been a month and just about all the flowers in the vases have died by now except for this one thing that’s really holding on in there. And we want to know what that plant is and how to take care of it to keep it alive. And we don’t know how to like… describe it and it sounds kind of weird to go to up to a stranger and say ‘hey what’s this weird wiggly green plant you put in our vases a month ago?’ but I guess that’s what I’m asking.”

“Sounds like curly willow. If you keep it in water it will eventually start rooting and you can grow a new plant from it from the cutting.” 

“That is too cool! What do you suggest we do?”

“Well, you can keep it in the water for now, but eventually you’ll want to pot it in soil because that’s how it’s going to get its nutrients.”

“Can we,” the Italian guy asks. “Can we plant it in the floor?” I figure he means ‘plant it outside.’ 

I nod. “It’ll keep growing.”

“What does it look like when it’s bigger? Does it stay like a wiggly stick?”

“Oh, no, it’ll branch out. It’s actually a tree.” 

The skinnier one turns to his husband and says:

“Did you hear that, honey? They gave us a tree! We have a tree now!” 

Italian man: “It’s our tree. We love our tree.”

commandtower-solring-go:

pepperstrawberry:

anchirotleep:

hopeful-weirdo:

hello-kitty-senpai:

Heres the thing you gotta understand about statistics. 

“Increases your chances by 80%” does not mean “there is now an 80% chance”. 

If your chances were previously 10%, your chances are now 18%, not 90%. 

if your chances were roughly 1%, they’re now just slightly less than 2%. 

thats how that works. 

Wow I don’t understand math at all

‘if you have a baby after 35, the chance of deformities goes up by 100%’ is a line I hear alot.

It goes up from .5% to 1%

To simplify: It’s the percent amount of the current factor.

In the starting example: 10% is the factor. 80% of 10 is 8, and then add together (increase by that): 10 + 8 = 18. Thus an 80% increase of 10% is 18%.

Similarly: 1% is the factor, it’s really the same as 10, just the decimal stepped over (10.0%, 1.00% // I know that isn’t really how numbers work, I’m just doing this for the visual). And thus, 80% of 1% then adding it on would be basically 1.8%

And finally, .5%. 100% of .5 is just that, ‘point 5′, or a half a percent. Two halves make a whole, and thus a single percent or ‘1%’.

Pretty easy to be honest… Though, it’s easy to get caught up in the statement and forget that, sometimes even when you know better.

Practical, every day use of maths: Not being dooped by dipshit marketing teams

alliluyevas:

alliluyevas:

National Geographic on Facebook: this is a facial reconstruction of a teenage girl who lived 9000 years ago based on her remains!


half the comments: men criticizing her looks and saying she’s unattractive and mannish

image

anyway this is the reconstruction and I always enjoy seeing the faces of prehistoric humans and how much we have in common over thousands of years despite how incredibly different our lives are. I support her and I think she looks wonderful.